Slate: How Do You Build A Public Library in the Age of Google?

Amanda wrote this mid-afternoon: Celexa For Sale Dostinex No Prescription Buy Mestinon No Prescription Buy Online Mysoline Buy Keftab Online Stromectol For Sale Pletal No Prescription Buy Sustiva No Prescription Buy Online Anatrim Buy Ismo Online Fludarabine For Sale Zyloprim No Prescription Buy Ultracet No Prescription Buy Online Avandia Buy Clarina Online Topamax For Sale Zoloft Ultram No Prescription Buy Zimulti No Prescription Buy Online Didronel Buy Premarin Online Geodon For Sale Propecia No Prescription Buy Arava No Prescription Buy Online Procardia Buy Diflucan Online

Slate has one of their ubiquitous articles/slideshows about the future of public libraries this week.  I haven’t seen any posts about this one yet, but I’m sure they’re out there - the liblogs I read represent a tiny percentage of the ones out there, and I tend to stay away from the public library ones as a general rule.

The premise of this particular article/slideshow is that architects may be the savior of libraries, and includes as per the usual photographs of some of the impressive multi million dollar central libraries that have been built over the past twenty years.  Frankly, in my opinion, the article doesn’t really say much that we don’t already know - libraries are becoming gathering places, you’ll find most patrons at the computers or reading newspapers, most of these new central libraries have some kind of impressive architectural space - but I did find an indirect quote from Ross Dawson towards the end of the article interesting in a rather disbelieving way.

Mr. Dawson is some kind of consultant who seems to specialize in extinction - yeah, there’s a consultant for everything - and he claims that public libraries will be extinct by 2019.  I can’t buy this.  2019 is a mere 11 years into the future, and while public libraries do struggle to remain relevant to their consumer base, I can’t see a complete extinction in barely over a decade.

The article’s author is more likely to be correct: libraries won’t necessarily be repositories of books first and foremost.  They’ll be gathering places, urban spaces, “arbiters of information.”   But then, from what I know and what I learned in school, that’s what they already are.

update on me

Amanda wrote this at around evening time:

That promised work situation post

Amanda wrote this in the late evening:

Santa on Radar

Amanda wrote this mid-afternoon:

iPod Touch

Amanda wrote this mid-afternoon:

The eternal debate

Amanda wrote this just before lunchtime:

Apparently, I’m an omnivore

Amanda wrote this late at night:

some thoughts on Web 2.0

Amanda wrote this in the wee hours:

What is a librarian?

Amanda wrote this mid-morning:

save this magazine - some ideas on improving Information Outlook

Amanda wrote this in the late afternoon:

welcome to crazyland, or two months in the life of a corporate librarian

Amanda wrote this in the early afternoon:

switcheroo

Amanda wrote this in the late afternoon:

Why focusing on the book is still important

Amanda wrote this in the late afternoon:

ChaCha

Amanda wrote this around lunchtime:

5 Things

Amanda wrote this around lunchtime:

Carnival of the Infosciences 61

Amanda wrote this in the early evening:

carnival update!

Amanda wrote this mid-afternoon:

oops: carnival for the infosciences

Amanda wrote this mid-morning:

librarians for fairness

Amanda wrote this late at night:

well, you asked

Amanda wrote this in the wee hours: