carnival of the infosciences #26

Amanda wrote this in the early morning: Celexa For Sale Dostinex No Prescription Buy Mestinon No Prescription Buy Online Mysoline Buy Keftab Online Stromectol For Sale Pletal No Prescription Buy Sustiva No Prescription Buy Online Anatrim Buy Ismo Online Fludarabine For Sale Zyloprim No Prescription Buy Ultracet No Prescription Buy Online Avandia Buy Clarina Online Topamax For Sale Zoloft Ultram No Prescription Buy Zimulti No Prescription Buy Online Didronel Buy Premarin Online Geodon For Sale Propecia No Prescription Buy Arava No Prescription Buy Online Procardia Buy Diflucan Online

The lights are bright on the fairway, Madame has her tarot cards out and ready, and the barker’s ready and willing to take your money, so let’s get started:

  • Our first two submissions come from Nicole Engard, who points out the exceedingly awesome Blogga Song and her own rant on being trapped by her ILS, a feeling I know well (some days I think that if my HTML wasn’t utterly elementary and by SQL even worse, I could design a better one)
  • Jessamyn points out A DAM Survey on HangingTogether, the excellent RLG blog. As Jessamyn says:

    I like the RLG blog, and if I had to pit the OCLC “It’s all good” blog versus this one, I know which one I’d pick. This blog is updated less frequently, but its topics are weightier and more interesting to me personally.

    I don’t totally grok the carnival thing, but I assume sending on someone else’s post, even if it’s a little older, is okay.

    With that in mind: A DAM survey Discusses the results of a survey of museums and how they are dealing with digital assets management and discusses how the survey blurs the line between digital resources and the business of digital preservation.

  • From TangognaT: “I nominate Amanda @ Household Opera’s Why research is hard, part 2 since she’s exploring some of the problems researchers in the humanities encounter when they try to do research in an academic library.”
  • Charlton Braganza provides us with seven ideal qualities for outreach and reference. And Sean Connery would definitely make the better librarian.
  • Greg Schwartz points out that Stephen Abram has a great post called The Library 2.0 ‘Bandwagon’ that explains his view of how Library 2.0 is changing what libraries do. I personally remain skeptical - and yes, I have an intense dislike of catchphrases like ‘Library 2.0′ - but Stephen makes several interesting points about how Web 2.0 technologies are changing how we achieve our goals. I still think that these goals, if stripped to their very essence, remain the same, however.
  • Christina brings us The reference interview in a scientific research setting: question pairs establish intellectual identity about the secret handshake between scientific researchers and librarians.
  • Dave Hook answers my call for representation from special libraries with Photo sharing applications in corporate libraries, a great demonstration of how social software applications are used in the corporate setting.

I’d chosen several picks for the editor’s choice this week - I was raised by a Boy Scout - but we’ll pare my choices down to just two:

And that’s all from me. Next week, the Carnival heads over to Library Stuff and Steven Cohen’s capable hands. You can email your submissions to him at stevenmcohen [at] gmail [dot] com.

One Response to “carnival of the infosciences #26”

  1. Dr. Harish Chandra Says:

    You are really updated

Leave a Reply